Forex Fury vs Kestrel Expert Advisor
Forex Fury and Kestrel are compared here on one thing only: what each vendor publishes and on which date. Neither had a verified real-money account on the dates below, and that is the honest headline of this page.
See pricing and licence levels
What each vendor publishes
| Forex Fury | Kestrel | |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts visible | Five, all demo | Two demo, running since September 2026 |
| Deepest drawdown shown | 43% and 52% | 14.3% to 33.1% of the recommended capital, simulated, fixed lot |
| Simulation published | None read | 2010 to September 2026, method published |
| Read on | 29 August 2025 | Own runs |
The profile also listed growth of +1,434% on a USDJPY account and +345% on a USDCHF one. Both were demo, so those percentages describe a simulation of a simulation.
Where the comparison is fair
Neither vendor can point at a verified real-money account, so nobody here is entitled to the moral high ground. What differs is how much of the method is on the table.
Kestrel publishes which feed, which spread, which period, how the floating loss is valued and what the run excludes — on Kestrel Expert Advisor Backtest 2010-2025: Full Report. Published method is not the same as a good result, and it is not offered here as one. It is simply the part a buyer can check without trusting anybody.
What the strategies do differently
Fury is described by its vendor as range scalping: many short trades, small targets, risk that shows up as a fast sequence of small losses. Kestrel is a grid expert advisor for MetaTrader 4 — what that means, in full, is on Kestrel Grid EA for MT4: Expert Advisor With Controlled Lots — so its risk shows up as one floating loss that has not closed yet.
That floating loss is the number to compare. Kestrel’s largest was −€2,788 on EURUSD Patient on 21 August 2024 (32.8% of the €8,500 that record recommends, simulated). Across the 2010 to September 2026 record, 187 of 201 months closed positive; the worst month in the 2010–2025 stretch, April 2015, closed −€1,301 at Horizon level and the best, May 2015, closed +€1,629 (simulated).
A demo account proves the software decides, sends and closes as designed; it says nothing about slippage, swap or real fills. That is why our own two demo accounts are described as a forward test on demo, never as a track record.
If you decide for Kestrel
You choose your pairs — 1 to 4 of EURUSD, GBPUSD, EURCAD and AUDCAD — then Patient, Active or both for each (Patient adds to a basket less often and holds a smaller worst case; Active adds more often, returned more in the backtest and reached a larger worst case), and the level whose recommended capital fits your account: Horizon €999, Summit €4,999 or Zenith €9,999 per year, VAT included. Like the kestrel that hangs still in the wind, it waits for its own signal instead of scalping every range.
The wider table of published drawdowns is in Best Forex EA 2026: Expert Advisors Compared by Drawdown, and everything we have — including what is missing — on Is Kestrel a Profitable Expert Advisor? The Full Record.
Frequently asked questions
Does Fury publish a real trading account?
Not in what we could read. Its Myfxbook profile on 29 August 2025 showed five accounts and all five were demo, with drawdowns of 43% on a USDJPY account and 52% on a USDCHF one.
Does Kestrel publish a real trading account?
No. Kestrel publishes a 2010–2025 simulation on Dukascopy data and a forward test that has been running on two demo accounts since September 2026. Both are labelled as what they are on every page.
So what separates the two records?
Length and method. Kestrel's simulation covers sixteen years of historical data with the worst floating loss dated to the episode, while the demo accounts read on the Fury profile were shorter and showed no method page.
See pricing and licence levels
Last updated: